From oedipus at hicom.net Thu Nov 1 07:15:49 2007 From: oedipus at hicom.net (Gregory J. Rosmaita) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 14:15:49 +0000 Subject: [html4all] On-Line Web 2.0 Accessibility Course using the W3C emerging ARIA Specifications Message-ID: <20071101141211.M68928@hicom.net> ---- FORWARDED EMESSAGE ----- From: Jon Gunderson Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:08:42 -0500 (CDT) Subj: On-Line Web 2.0 Accessibility Course using the W3C emerging ARIA Specifications I am going to be teaching an on-line course on Web 2.0 accessibility issues to try to raise more awareness of Web 2.0 accessibility issues and how the ARIA specifications are supporting accessibility of Web 2.0 interface technologies. I would appreciate it if you know of people who would be interested in taking this course to pass this information on to them. Thanks, Jon On-Line Web 2.0 Accessibility Course using the emerging W3C ARIA Specifications More information http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/courses/web20online/ Dates and Time * Dates: November 26th to December 19th, 2007 * Days: Monday and Wednesdays * Time: 3:00pm - 4:00pm CST (Chicago Local Time) Overview The on-line course is designed for web developers creating Web 2.0 applications to learn about the accessibility of these technologies to people with disabilities. Participants will learn about keyboard support, focus management issues and how to use the emerging W3C Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) specifications to create accessible Web 2.0 applications. Participants will learn about the accessibility issues faced by people with disabilities in using the web, and how web 2.0 resources can be designed to improve accessibility using the ARIA technologies. Participants will learn about keyboard models, setting keyboard focus, the W3C Roles for ARIA and States and Properties Module for ARIA specifications for making web 2.0 widgets compatible with assistive technologies through ARIA support in Firefox browser and assistive technologies like WindowEyes and JAWS screen readers. Participants will build and test the accessible Web 2.0 widgets using a best practices model, and learn about compatibility issues related to supporting ARIA widgets with Microsoft Internet Explorer and creating valid HTML documents. Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology (DRES) WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Sun Nov 4 10:29:38 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:29:38 -0600 Subject: [html4all] Accessibility Design Principle Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711041029v3c2c4040lc2db29f7973d5a5a@mail.gmail.com> In case anyone missed it, quite a lot of progress was made on IRC [1] regarding the Accessibility Design Principle [2]. Thank you Steve and Anne and others for removing the "when possible" [3] [4] verbiage and making it a principle in its own right as well as splitting up the aspects of universality. This is a big improvement. Good collaboration too. Best Regards, Laura [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20071102#l-112 [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.html#accessibility [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/1291.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0898.html -- Laura L. Carlson From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Sun Nov 4 10:47:20 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:47:20 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Accessibility Design Principle In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711041029v3c2c4040lc2db29f7973d5a5a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1c8dbcaa0711041029v3c2c4040lc2db29f7973d5a5a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <55687cf80711041047x27c89c49j300e2af9b42c176a@mail.gmail.com> Hi Laura, thanks. I was not sure if i had helped in a way that other people would agree with, but i was pleased that accessibility got split out from the other aspects of universality, and that the first two sentences of "5.3. Accessibility" are quite explicit: "Design features to be accessible to users with disabilities. Access by everyone regardless of ability is essential." On 04/11/2007, Laura Carlson wrote: > In case anyone missed it, quite a lot of progress was made on IRC [1] > regarding the Accessibility Design Principle [2]. > > Thank you Steve and Anne and others for removing the "when possible" > [3] [4] verbiage and making it a principle in its own right as well as > splitting up the aspects of universality. > > This is a big improvement. Good collaboration too. > > Best Regards, > Laura > [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20071102#l-112 > [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.html#accessibility > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/1291.html > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0898.html > -- > Laura L. Carlson > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From ecrire at catherine-roy.net Sun Nov 4 14:52:36 2007 From: ecrire at catherine-roy.net (zara) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:52:36 -0500 Subject: [html4all] Accessibility Design Principle In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711041047x27c89c49j300e2af9b42c176a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <0JR000A277JRH1F0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> Hi, I think this is indeed really significant and positive and useful. Thank you Stephen for your efforts and thank you to all those who contributed. Catherine -- Catherine Roy www.catherine-roy.net > -----Original Message----- > From: list-bounces at html4all.org [mailto:list- > bounces at html4all.org] On Behalf Of Steven Faulkner > Sent: November 4, 2007 1:47 PM > To: HTML4All > Subject: Re: [html4all] Accessibility Design > Principle > > Hi Laura, > thanks. > I was not sure if i had helped in a way that other > people would agree > with, but i was pleased > that accessibility got split out from the other > aspects of > universality, and that the first two sentences > of "5.3. Accessibility" are quite explicit: > > "Design features to be accessible to users with > disabilities. Access > by everyone regardless of ability is essential." > > On 04/11/2007, Laura Carlson > wrote: > > In case anyone missed it, quite a lot of progress > was made on IRC [1] > > regarding the Accessibility Design Principle [2]. > > > > Thank you Steve and Anne and others for removing > the "when possible" > > [3] [4] verbiage and making it a principle in its > own right as well as > > splitting up the aspects of universality. > > > > This is a big improvement. Good collaboration too. > > > > Best Regards, > > Laura > > [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html- > wg/20071102#l-112 > > [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-design- > principles/Overview.html#accessibility > > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > html/2007Jul/1291.html > > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > html/2007Jun/0898.html > > -- > > Laura L. Carlson > > > > _______________________________________________ > > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > > > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > Technical Director - TPG Europe > Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org > Web Accessibility Toolbar - > http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie- > about.html > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - > Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM From ecrire at catherine-roy.net Sun Nov 4 14:54:20 2007 From: ecrire at catherine-roy.net (zara) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:54:20 -0500 Subject: [html4all] Accessibility Design Principle In-Reply-To: <0JR000A277JRH1F0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> Message-ID: <0JR000G5E7MNQJB0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> > Thank you Stephen for your efforts and thank you to > all those who contributed. Oops, sorry, I meant "Steven". Catherine > > -----Original Message----- > > From: list-bounces at html4all.org [mailto:list- > > bounces at html4all.org] On Behalf Of Steven Faulkner > > Sent: November 4, 2007 1:47 PM > > To: HTML4All > > Subject: Re: [html4all] Accessibility Design > > Principle > > > > Hi Laura, > > thanks. > > I was not sure if i had helped in a way that other > > people would agree > > with, but i was pleased > > that accessibility got split out from the other > > aspects of > > universality, and that the first two sentences > > of "5.3. Accessibility" are quite explicit: > > > > "Design features to be accessible to users with > > disabilities. Access > > by everyone regardless of ability is essential." > > > > On 04/11/2007, Laura Carlson > > wrote: > > > In case anyone missed it, quite a lot of > progress > > was made on IRC [1] > > > regarding the Accessibility Design Principle [2]. > > > > > > Thank you Steve and Anne and others for removing > > the "when possible" > > > [3] [4] verbiage and making it a principle in its > > own right as well as > > > splitting up the aspects of universality. > > > > > > This is a big improvement. Good collaboration > too. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Laura > > > [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html- > > wg/20071102#l-112 > > > [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-design- > > principles/Overview.html#accessibility > > > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > > html/2007Jul/1291.html > > > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > > html/2007Jun/0898.html > > > -- > > > Laura L. Carlson > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > > > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > > > > > > > > -- > > with regards > > > > Steve Faulkner > > Technical Director - TPG Europe > > Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium > > > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org > > Web Accessibility Toolbar - > > http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie- > > about.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - > > Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - > Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > > > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - > Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM From chaals at opera.com Sun Nov 4 19:39:37 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:39:37 -0500 Subject: [html4all] phonetic of some word or name In-Reply-To: References: <4722F876.7010308@free.fr> Message-ID: On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:48:10 -0300, Andy Mabbett wrote: > In message , Charles McCathieNevile > writes > >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:04:12 -0400, Andy Mabbett >> > wrote: > >> In message >> <4722F876.7010308 at free.fr>, >> aurelien.levyatfree.fr@?.?.invalid >> writes >> >>> did you think as me that it can be useful to have a new >> html element to >>> markup phonetic pronunciation of a word or name. >> >> >> [Hello folks: my first post here] >> >> I thank that might (at least in >> the interim) be a good case for a >> microformat. > > I think that is a bad >> idea. There is already markup in HTML that does > this > > Which is..? Ruby. See earlier in the thread for more detail. (Nothing stops you from making another ?format, of course. But I think it would just be fragmenting the problem so you are less likely to get an interoperable solution). cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Mon Nov 5 01:12:48 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 09:12:48 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Accessibility Design Principle In-Reply-To: <0JR000G5E7MNQJB0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> References: <0JR000A277JRH1F0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> <0JR000G5E7MNQJB0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> Message-ID: <55687cf80711050112m5dfc375s1a4a6621ecf9de58@mail.gmail.com> hi Zara, >Oops, sorry, I meant "Steven". no problem :-) On 04/11/2007, zara wrote: > > Thank you Stephen for your efforts and thank you to > > all those who contributed. > > Oops, sorry, I meant "Steven". > > > Catherine > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: list-bounces at html4all.org [mailto:list- > > > bounces at html4all.org] On Behalf Of Steven Faulkner > > > Sent: November 4, 2007 1:47 PM > > > To: HTML4All > > > Subject: Re: [html4all] Accessibility Design > > > Principle > > > > > > Hi Laura, > > > thanks. > > > I was not sure if i had helped in a way that other > > > people would agree > > > with, but i was pleased > > > that accessibility got split out from the other > > > aspects of > > > universality, and that the first two sentences > > > of "5.3. Accessibility" are quite explicit: > > > > > > "Design features to be accessible to users with > > > disabilities. Access > > > by everyone regardless of ability is essential." > > > > > > On 04/11/2007, Laura Carlson > > > wrote: > > > > In case anyone missed it, quite a lot of > > progress > > > was made on IRC [1] > > > > regarding the Accessibility Design Principle [2]. > > > > > > > > Thank you Steve and Anne and others for removing > > > the "when possible" > > > > [3] [4] verbiage and making it a principle in its > > > own right as well as > > > > splitting up the aspects of universality. > > > > > > > > This is a big improvement. Good collaboration > > too. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Laura > > > > [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html- > > > wg/20071102#l-112 > > > > [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-design- > > > principles/Overview.html#accessibility > > > > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > > > html/2007Jul/1291.html > > > > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > > > html/2007Jun/0898.html > > > > -- > > > > Laura L. Carlson > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > > > > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > with regards > > > > > > Steve Faulkner > > > Technical Director - TPG Europe > > > Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium > > > > > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org > > > Web Accessibility Toolbar - > > > http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie- > > > about.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > > > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - > > > Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - > > Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - > > Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - Release Date: 04/11/2007 11:05 AM > > > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Mon Nov 5 08:51:43 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:51:43 -0600 Subject: [html4all] HTML5 WG Survey Reminders Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711050851n8c0e3au7bea1d1ebcfaaa22@mail.gmail.com> Just a reminder for HTML5 working group members...if you intend to vote on the following surveys please do so before they close on November ninth. Release "HTML Design Principles" as a W3C Working Draft? http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/ Results so far: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd11spec/ Results so far: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd11spec/results Both surveys are open to HTML5 working group members from 2007-11-02 to 2007-11-09. Thanks. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From oedipus at hicom.net Wed Nov 7 12:12:28 2007 From: oedipus at hicom.net (Gregory J. Rosmaita) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 20:12:28 +0000 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki Message-ID: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> aloha, all! i know we haven't officially launched (or have we?), but i was wondering if there would be any objections to housing the document currently residing at: http://www.concentric.net/~unagi69/temp/wai/pf/TestsTests.html on the html4all wiki, so that it can be used to co-ordinate testing and bugfixing ARIA sample/example/test pages? currently, the test results are scattered, and collecting them in a single place where they can be referenced and updated as situations warrant, would be of inestimable aid to those working to get ARIA support into user agents and assisstive technologies... i think this effort is especially suited to html4all, and even epitomizes why html4all exists -- please let me (and the list) know if you disagree... gregory. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Egg-heads of the world unite -- you have nothing to lose but your yolks. -- Adalai Stevenson ----------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus at hicom.net and unagi69 at concentric.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/ Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus ----------------------------------------------------------------- From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Wed Nov 7 12:23:54 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:23:54 -0600 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> References: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711071223q6214440dp25c3c8323db0f669@mail.gmail.com> Hi Gregory, > i know we haven't officially launched (or have we?), Not yet. We still have some things to do. Check out: http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/Opening_Preparations Also there should be message in your in-box regarding "Opening Preparations Wiki Page". > but i was wondering > if there would be any objections to housing the document currently > residing at: > > http://www.concentric.net/~unagi69/temp/wai/pf/TestsTests.html Sounds good to me. How are things going at the Technical Plenary [1]. After you catch your breath, it you be great if you (or anyone else there) could give us a rundown on the the HTML5 accessibility stuff. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From foliot at wats.ca Wed Nov 7 13:11:49 2007 From: foliot at wats.ca (John Foliot) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:11:49 -0800 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> Message-ID: <005701c82182$d839a260$8600a8c0@Piglet> Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: > i was > wondering > if there would be any objections to housing the document > on the html4all wiki, I think it's a great idea, and if you want to spearhead this I for one have no objection at all. JF From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Wed Nov 7 13:33:42 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:33:42 +0000 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> References: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> Message-ID: <55687cf80711071333w411eaa2fs4d089feceb9b518b@mail.gmail.com> hi gregory, sounds like a great idea. i have just arrived at the conference, hope to catch up with you. regards steve On 07/11/2007, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: > aloha, all! > > i know we haven't officially launched (or have we?), but i was wondering > if there would be any objections to housing the document currently > residing at: > > http://www.concentric.net/~unagi69/temp/wai/pf/TestsTests.html > > on the html4all wiki, so that it can be used to co-ordinate testing and > bugfixing ARIA sample/example/test pages? currently, the test results > are scattered, and collecting them in a single place where they can be > referenced and updated as situations warrant, would be of inestimable > aid to those working to get ARIA support into user agents and assisstive > technologies... > > i think this effort is especially suited to html4all, and even > epitomizes why html4all exists -- please let me (and the list) > know if you disagree... > > gregory. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Egg-heads of the world unite -- you have nothing to lose but your > yolks. -- Adalai Stevenson > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus at hicom.net and unagi69 at concentric.net > Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/ > Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From Philip-and-LeKhanh at Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org Wed Nov 7 13:39:24 2007 From: Philip-and-LeKhanh at Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org (Philip TAYLOR) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:39:24 +0000 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <005701c82182$d839a260$8600a8c0@Piglet> References: <005701c82182$d839a260$8600a8c0@Piglet> Message-ID: <4732308C.6090304@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> ALso fine by me. ** Phil. -------- John Foliot wrote: > Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: >> i was >> wondering >> if there would be any objections to housing the document > >> on the html4all wiki, > > I think it's a great idea, and if you want to spearhead this I for one have > no objection at all. > > JF > > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki From joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie Wed Nov 7 15:49:46 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:49:46 +0000 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711071333w411eaa2fs4d089feceb9b518b@mail.gmail.com> References: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> <55687cf80711071333w411eaa2fs4d089feceb9b518b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47324F1A.4020108@cfit.ie> > i was wondering >> if there would be any objections to housing the document currently >> residing at: None from myside Gregory. Look forward to meeting you at the W3 gig. Cheers Josh From oedipus at hicom.net Thu Nov 8 06:20:13 2007 From: oedipus at hicom.net (Gregory J. Rosmaita) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:20:13 +0000 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711071223q6214440dp25c3c8323db0f669@mail.gmail.com> References: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> <1c8dbcaa0711071223q6214440dp25c3c8323db0f669@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20071108140821.M86642@hicom.net> aloha, laura! thanks for the update -- i didn't actually make it to the tech plenary, due to medical issues, but i've been participating in any and every f2f meeting that offered me a line to phone into or a computer to skype into so that i could be, for example, a fly on the wall during the tuesday morning ARIA issues meeting (and chime in in real time in the IRC portion of the meeting)... i've even managed to attend 3 meetings simultaneously, a trick i could never pull off in person... i'm still waiting for word of how the ARIA demonstrations went (there was one, i believe, at plenary day, and one today for the HTML WG, hence the intense concentration on making sure that the sample pages were coded correctly and tested with as many configurations as possible, work that will continue in the "open" on wai-xtech gregory. -------------------------------------------------------------- You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus. -- Mark Twain -------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus at hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/ Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Laura Carlson" To: HTML4All Sent: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:23:54 -0600 Subject: Re: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki > Hi Gregory, > > > i know we haven't officially launched (or have we?), > > Not yet. We still have some things to do. > > Check out: > http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/Opening_Preparations > > Also there should be message in your in-box regarding "Opening > Preparations Wiki Page". > > > but i was wondering > > if there would be any objections to housing the document currently > > residing at: > > > > http://www.concentric.net/~unagi69/temp/wai/pf/TestsTests.html > > Sounds good to me. > > How are things going at the Technical Plenary [1]. > > After you catch your breath, it you be great if you (or anyone else > there) could give us a rundown on the the HTML5 accessibility stuff. > > Best Regards, > Laura > -- > Laura L. Carlson > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki ------- End of Original Message ------- From joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie Fri Nov 9 07:00:20 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:00:20 +0000 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <20071108140821.M86642@hicom.net> References: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> <1c8dbcaa0711071223q6214440dp25c3c8323db0f669@mail.gmail.com> <20071108140821.M86642@hicom.net> Message-ID: <47347604.6040307@cfit.ie> Hi Gregory, Am very sorry that you couldn't make it to the tech plenary as I was looking forward to meeting you but glad that you were there in spirit, and in a sonic form, and a rather omniscient one by the sounds of it :-) I missed the ARIA session on Tues but the session on Thursday for the HTML WG went very well. Mike gave a demonstration of some ARIA widgets and Aaron gave a talk about ARIA. The group as a whole didn't get a chance to talk about ARIA which I was disappointed by but, for me, the day was saved as we had an impromptu session with several interested people to discuss ARIA later on in the afternoon - which was really interesting and a a great chance to pick Aaron's brains, to which he graciously relented. Cheers Josh From foliot at wats.ca Fri Nov 9 09:10:44 2007 From: foliot at wats.ca (John Foliot) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:10:44 -0800 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <47347604.6040307@cfit.ie> Message-ID: <000a01c822f3$789e3290$f200800a@Piglet> Joshue O Connor wrote: > > I missed the ARIA session on Tues but the session on Thursday for the > HTML WG went very well. Mike gave a demonstration of some ARIA > widgets and Aaron gave a talk about ARIA. The group as a whole didn't > get a chance to talk about ARIA which I was disappointed by but, for > me, the day was saved as we had an impromptu session with several > interested people to discuss ARIA later on in the afternoon - which > was really interesting and a a great chance to pick Aaron's brains, > to which he graciously relented. Hi Josh, I for one hope to get a fuller report upon your return home... Especially any interaction between you and the WHAT GW/HTML5 WG contingent I am currently at a conference in Boulder Colorado - Accessing Higher Ground, and just sat in on a session presented by Jon Gunderson on ARIA... It was very interesting. When time allows we should swap impressions. Cheers! JF From oedipus at hicom.net Fri Nov 9 09:36:24 2007 From: oedipus at hicom.net (Gregory J. Rosmaita) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:36:24 +0000 Subject: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki In-Reply-To: <47347604.6040307@cfit.ie> References: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> <1c8dbcaa0711071223q6214440dp25c3c8323db0f669@mail.gmail.com> <20071108140821.M86642@hicom.net> <47347604.6040307@cfit.ie> Message-ID: <20071109172915.M31231@hicom.net> aloha, josh! i too was "looking" forward to meeting you and hanging out outside the parameters of technology -- and, to boot, i forgot to give chaals or doug the CDs i burnt for you when they left for cambridge after stopping in jersey for some sleep and a last ditch effort to get me to boston... i have a very poor quality (audio-wise) AVI file that i asked someone who was there to create using his web-cam, in order to capture the demos -- i want to try and clean it up and compress it further by converting it to an ogg or theora -- is there room on the wiki for a 20 minute file? i could always stick it in ubats.org space -- i think i have the room, and don't want to over-burden the wiki... gregory. -------------------------------------------------------------- I've taken more out of alcohol than alcohol's taken out of me. -- Sir Winston Churchill -------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus at hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/ Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Joshue O Connor To: HTML4All Sent: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:00:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [html4all] request: ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki > Hi Gregory, > > Am very sorry that you couldn't make it to the tech plenary as I > was looking forward to meeting you but glad that you were there > in spirit, and in a sonic form, and a rather omniscient one by > the sounds of it :-) > > I missed the ARIA session on Tues but the session on Thursday > for the HTML WG went very well. Mike gave a demonstration of > some ARIA widgets and Aaron gave a talk about ARIA. The group as > a whole didn't get a chance to talk about ARIA which I was > disappointed by but, for me, the day was saved as we had an > impromptu session with several interested people to discuss > ARIA later on in the afternoon - which was really interesting > and a a great chance to pick Aaron's brains, to which he > graciously relented. > > Cheers > > Josh From oedipus at hicom.net Fri Nov 9 09:41:46 2007 From: oedipus at hicom.net (Gregory J. Rosmaita) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:41:46 +0000 Subject: [html4all] ARIA Test Results index on html4all wiki (update) In-Reply-To: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> References: <20071107200917.M2761@hicom.net> Message-ID: <20071109173639.M77394@hicom.net> by the way, i have ported the static XHTML 1.0 strict page that resides at: http://www.concentric.net/~unagi69/temp/wai/pf/TestsTests.html to: http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/ARIATestTests and while i intend to funnel results data back to the mozilla ARIA page, i will not abandon this page, as the mozilla implementation info is in an extremely unnecessary table, and i have received very positive feedback on the same materials in a definition list... testing coordination will occur on wai-xtech at w3.org thanks, gregory. --------------------------------------------------------------- DELIBERATION, n. The act of examining one's bread to determine which side it is buttered on. Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary --------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus at hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/ Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus/ United Blind Advocates for Talking Signs: http://ubats.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------- From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Sat Nov 10 09:00:44 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:00:44 -0600 Subject: [html4all] ISSUE-14: Integration of WAI-ARIA roles into HTML5 Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711100900k6498672dt6f63482500fc9209@mail.gmail.com> f.y.i. ISSUE-14: Integration of WAI-ARIA roles into HTML5 Raised by: Gregory Rosmaita http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/14 Also ARIA was the subject on IRC today: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20071110#l-171 Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Sat Nov 10 16:08:51 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:08:51 -0600 Subject: [html4all] notes from the f2f Message-ID: <55687cf80711101608l7e510139o7d6e96835d8235f3@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, I was able to attend the HTML working group face to face meeting, which finished up this morning. the nature of the meeting (unconference style) saw people break up into groups to discuss particular subjects. these included ARIA and Data tables. html 5/accessibility related news i picked up from my time here. Seems pretty much like ARIA will be usable with HTML 5, the issues being debated are peripheral. In the ARIA breakout group on thursday the heartening news from a guy from microsoft (can't rememebr his name - josh has minutes of the meet) was that ARIA support is going to be implemented in IE (when unkown), the guy seemed quite unequivocal about it, his statement appeared to catch aaron leventhal by surprise. so fingers crossed. a small group (me. josh and justin thorp (a top guy from the EO WG)) attended ben millards and james grahams breakout group on data tables. It was interesting stuff. ben has done a lot of work on data tables (in the wild) and JGraham has built a cool test thing for showing the associations that are derived using various table algorithms (http://james.html5.org/tables/table_inspector.html). what struck me was that the proposed algorithm(s) do a good job of associating headers and data within complex tables. Also after doing a quick check of both jaws and window eyes, neither appear to implement the HTML 4 algorithm. There was lots of other stuff going on, much of which went over my head, but it was still interesting to watch the dynamics of the various players in the group(s). I made a point of introducing myself to people whom I had interacted with in the working group (irc/email): ian hickson, james graham, majiec, anne, henri, dan etc. The reaction from ranged from friendly to rude, but mostly friendly, i discussed my various people experiences with josh who introduced me to to the term "autism spectrum" and i came to the conclusion that its not worth worrying about those who can't act in a civil manner. But meeting people f2f will help inform my ongoing interactions with them on the WG. Mike smith from the W3c (he is now the html wg technical contact) made a point of introducing himself to me on the first day, he seems like a really nice guy and he was easy to chat to. Found dan conolly generally unfriendly and dismissive, which was suprising, but from observing his behaviour over the time of the conference, i didn't take it personally as he appeared generally dismissive of anyone that he didn't rate. A bright spot was that Anne and Ian hickson were both very personable. -- with regards Steve F From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Sat Nov 10 18:05:30 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:05:30 -0600 Subject: [html4all] notes from the f2f In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711101608l7e510139o7d6e96835d8235f3@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711101608l7e510139o7d6e96835d8235f3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711101805j573922c8p769662510408b678@mail.gmail.com> Hi Steve, Thanks you so very much for the for the report. The ARIA news and the the proposed algorithm(s) for associating headers and data within complex tables sounds very promising. It is good news indeed! Have a safe trip home. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Sat Nov 10 18:15:30 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:15:30 -0600 Subject: [html4all] Articles: New Organizations and Wiki Collaboration Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711101815l75f1aa4cv70f88ddf54fa9a29@mail.gmail.com> For your information, a couple of articles on new organizations and Wiki collaboration: In a recent post regarding a new web standards Facegroup group, Jeffery Zeldman made the following observation, "I am curious whether the new group will become a passive affinity group or something more. By passive affinity group, I mean the kind of group people join to show they belong - and then don't do much, if anything, once they've joined. For instance, hundreds of thousands of people joined a Facebook group in support of the monks' protest in Burma. Everyone who joined supports free speech and democracy, but only a tiny handful of group members create content or begin initiatives. For the few who are active, membership in the Burmese monk support group is an act of political and spiritual engagement. But for most members, it's passive. This is true of all social groups (online and off) and nearly all human activities..." http://www.zeldman.com/2007/11/02/dwws-facebook-group/ Also an article by Maish Nichani, Planning and Sustaining Wiki-based Collaboration: "Many organizations are experimenting with wiki-based collaboration projects. But only a small percentage of these projects make it past the initial excitement or pilot phase. One of the reasons for the drop-off is that there's not enough thought given to them other than deciding which wiki product to install. This article presents a framework that can help groups wanting to use wikis for internal projects better plan and sustain their collaboration efforts..." http://tinyurl.com/yt7yor -- Laura L. Carlson From joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie Mon Nov 12 06:38:16 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:38:16 +0000 Subject: [html4all] notes from the f2f In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711101608l7e510139o7d6e96835d8235f3@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711101608l7e510139o7d6e96835d8235f3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47386558.8090602@cfit.ie> Hi All, As Steve mentioned the conference was an interesting opportunity to see how the various players interact and was a total eye opener. However, the "un-conference" style of the meeting left a lot to be desired, especially after traveling half way around the planet to get there. I would have liked more "conference" and less "un". I guess that means I am a traditionalist or uptight or something, well so be it. The guitars and singsongs were not necessary and the whole thing was made even worse when juxtaposed with - to be frank - the rather bullish manner that Dan C oversaw the whole thing. It seemed to me to be all "I'd like to by the world a Coke" one minute but if you spoke out of line the soundtrack quickly changed to something about guns and they were pointed at you. This is obviously an analogy but just to be clear. While they all obviously saw themselves as kind of kooky and fun loving non-conformists, I just saw a Bob Roberts nightmare. [1] [2] To be frank it wasn't even the guitars, which on one level would have been great, if I was drunk but it was 11am. This bullishness, was a real surprise as Dan is a good moderator in the list, reasonably asking people to provide evidence and research for their positions/stance/suggestions. Also when during the ARIA meeting Rich mentioned Freedom Scientific and Dans response was 'Freedom who?" I got an insight into where accessibility seems to be in the food chain. In fact if you "spoke" at all, it had to be via IRC which I had problems getting to work. I don't know why they even had a F2F as the IRC was where most of the real dialogue seemed to me to take place anyway. IMO as soon as there is a biological IRC interface the W3C will happily move to a more matrix style domain. The whole experience - to be frank - left me feeling strangely nullified and I have seriously considered leaving the group as my energies could certainly be better directed elsewhere. There are also others in the group who are very knowledgeable about accessibility and the needs of people with disabilities, our Steve F and Chaals, Gregory. I knew beforehand that I was a small cog but now I am even wondering about the value of small cog status and I feel like just getting on with my own thing and leaving all of this spec trashing to those who are taken seriously, or who have power in the group. That's one level. On a personal level, it was a great chance to meet some people and I had a laugh with Steve and we had a really nice meal one eve with Shawn Henry, Ben and Justin, in a great Afghani restaurant. I didn't think Afghanis did vegetarian food and was expecting lamb with bullets, but was very pleasantly surprised. Also getting to chat with Aaron about ARIA in a small group during the breakout was great. > Seems pretty much like ARIA will be usable with HTML 5, the issues > being debated are peripheral. Some of the issues. [3] [4] >> a small group (me. josh and justin thorp (a top guy from the EO WG)) >> attended ben millards and james grahams breakout group on data tables. >> It was interesting stuff. It was. What Ben and James are suggesting is a way of combining algorithms to ensure a combination of data table layouts etc can be presented to the user when mark up is missing or badly applied. Ben has put a huge amount of research and energy into this area and James' testing tool is really useful to measure the efficiency of various algorithms so I also recommend people to keep an eye on this issue and their work. Also I have to say thanks to Ian Hickson who was very personable and thanked me for my contribution to the group and also Michael Smith who made the effort to introduce himself and also made me feel welcome. The funny thing is that I felt more a part of the HTML5 WG *before* the meeting but realise now that this was because this interaction was taking place via an artificial medium. The F2F has made me question the value of my involvement and shattered an illusion. This is actually good. I talked this over with Steve and after some more thought, decided to stay but I will be far more discerning of my input into the group. Josh [1] http://www.flickr.com/photos/kplawver/1934607835/in/photostream/ [2] http://www.flickr.com/photos/kplawver/1934611155/in/photostream/ [3] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ARIAIntegration [4] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/14 From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Tue Nov 13 01:04:13 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:04:13 +0000 Subject: [html4all] IRC snippet on ARIA Message-ID: <55687cf80711130104o3ce1563et29275691c5b52bf9@mail.gmail.com> from the IRC yesterday: anne: was an official decision reached on aria- ? for html? the HTML WG doesn't do such things during F2F meetings I believe nobody is against it though (that became clear during the meeting) (http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20071112) -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From joshue.oconnor at ncbi.ie Wed Nov 14 05:32:07 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at ncbi.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:32:07 +0000 Subject: [html4all] AxsAJAX Message-ID: <473AF8D7.2080302@ncbi.ie> Google are releasing their own AJAX framework. [1] Theres also an FAQ. [2] Thoughts? [1] http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2007/11/introducing-axsjax-access-enabling-ajax.html [2] http://code.google.com/p/google-axsjax ******************************************************************** NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of NCBI ******************************************************************** From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 00:25:12 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:25:12 +0000 Subject: [html4all] AxsAJAX In-Reply-To: <473AF8D7.2080302@ncbi.ie> References: <473AF8D7.2080302@ncbi.ie> Message-ID: <55687cf80711150025u2416a99cm35d4c91a6a040977@mail.gmail.com> I am trying to work out what it does... On 14/11/2007, Joshue O Connor wrote: > Google are releasing their own AJAX framework. [1] > > Theres also an FAQ. [2] > > Thoughts? > > [1] > http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2007/11/introducing-axsjax-access-enabling-ajax.html > [2] http://code.google.com/p/google-axsjax > > ******************************************************************** > > NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments > is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of > the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify > the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to > delete it and any attachments from your system. > > NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated > by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, > it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are > transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. > > Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email > and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily > represent the views of NCBI > > > ******************************************************************** > > > > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie Thu Nov 15 00:57:35 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:57:35 +0000 Subject: [html4all] AxsAJAX In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711150025u2416a99cm35d4c91a6a040977@mail.gmail.com> References: <473AF8D7.2080302@ncbi.ie> <55687cf80711150025u2416a99cm35d4c91a6a040977@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <473C09FF.5040709@cfit.ie> Are they proprietary APIs? Steven Faulkner wrote: > I am trying to work out what it does... > > On 14/11/2007, Joshue O Connor wrote: >> Google are releasing their own AJAX framework. [1] >> >> Theres also an FAQ. [2] >> >> Thoughts? >> >> [1] >> http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2007/11/introducing-axsjax-access-enabling-ajax.html >> [2] http://code.google.com/p/google-axsjax >> >> ******************************************************************** >> >> NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments >> is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of >> the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify >> the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to >> delete it and any attachments from your system. >> >> NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated >> by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, >> it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are >> transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. >> >> Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email >> and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily >> represent the views of NCBI >> >> >> ******************************************************************** >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List_HTML4all.org mailing list >> http://www.html4all.org/wiki >> > > From gez.lemon at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 01:32:34 2007 From: gez.lemon at gmail.com (Gez Lemon) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:32:34 +0000 Subject: [html4all] AxsAJAX In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711150025u2416a99cm35d4c91a6a040977@mail.gmail.com> References: <473AF8D7.2080302@ncbi.ie> <55687cf80711150025u2416a99cm35d4c91a6a040977@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Steve, > I am trying to work out what [AxsJAX] does... It injects ARIA properties into web applications based on design patterns. A user would either have it set as a bookmarklet and activate it themselves to enhance the accessibility of a Web 2.0 application, or as a GreaseMonkey script so that it's activated automatically. The enhancements are based around ARIA live regions, which has little support in AT at the moment, but works with Fire Vox. According to the documentation, the applications it enhances at the moment are Google Reader and Google Search. Cheers, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 01:35:49 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:35:49 -0600 Subject: [html4all] xtech discussion on alt Attribute Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711150135h78298334x30a33e11847ecf3@mail.gmail.com> Al Gilman is beginning discussion on our "Request for PFWG WAI review of Omitting alt Attribute for Critical Content" at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2007Nov/0012.html Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 01:41:15 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:41:15 +0000 Subject: [html4all] xtech discussion on alt Attribute In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711150135h78298334x30a33e11847ecf3@mail.gmail.com> References: <1c8dbcaa0711150135h78298334x30a33e11847ecf3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <55687cf80711150141m6934e9f2ha9243a0cf6c46707@mail.gmail.com> hi laura, yes, i noticed this, found it difficult to understand what he was on about, but it was early this morning when i read it. Will try again and see if i can make more sense of it. On 15/11/2007, Laura Carlson wrote: > Al Gilman is beginning discussion on our "Request for PFWG WAI review > of Omitting alt Attribute for Critical Content" at: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2007Nov/0012.html > > Best Regards, > Laura > -- > Laura L. Carlson > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Fri Nov 16 09:26:52 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:26:52 -0600 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> I'm trying to get my head around this issue: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/15 Thoughts on the accessibility implications? Results so far on the HTML5 Working Group survey are at: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/req-gapi-canvas/results Relate Reference: http://www.w3.org/2007/11/10-html-wg-minutes.html#item04 Thanks. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From chaals at opera.com Mon Nov 19 02:29:39 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:29:39 +0100 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:26:52 +0100, Laura Carlson wrote: > I'm trying to get my head around this issue: > "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/15 > > Thoughts on the accessibility implications? Canvas absolutey requires fallback content - it has pretty uch zero inherent accessibility :( One thing that could be interesting is to allow image m aps to be used on a canvas (they are currently not) giving an ability to define hotspots that have at least an alt and title, and can also be used with an acceskey etc. Given that canvas is ideal for games, as well as trivial decorative stuff, this bears lookng at. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk Tue Nov 20 14:12:32 2007 From: P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk (Philip Taylor (Webmaster)) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:12:32 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Laura wrote : > I'm trying to get my head around this issue: > "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/15 > > Thoughts on the accessibility implications? , like any fundamentally visual element, necessarily excludes those who lack all or most visual perception. If , or something analogous (see my response) is to make it into a future HTML spec., then it is essential that it provide adequate fallback capability to allow non-visual content to be substituted. The latter will, by necessity, almost certainly be a /poor/ substitute, but I think we would be beating our heads against a 6' solid oak door if we were to try to insist that all fallback content be a perfect substitute for the inaccessible (visual) content. However, the real question is "Does allow for fallback content at all?", and the draft spec. totally fails to clarify this. The more frequently I read the draft spec., the more convinced I become that, in trying to be all things to all men, it is fundamentally failing to communicate anything useful at all. It needs (IMHO) separating out into a number of quite distinct documents, /one/ of which would define the syntax of each proposed element in a simple and straightforward way. My 2 old zlotych-worth ... ** Phil. From chaals at opera.com Wed Nov 21 02:34:40 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:34:40 +0100 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Message-ID: On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:12:32 +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: ... > If , or something > analogous (see my response) is to make it into > a future HTML spec., then it is essential that > it provide adequate fallback capability to allow > non-visual content to be substituted. Agreed. > The latter > will, by necessity, almost certainly be a /poor/ > substitute, Only if written by people who don't understand what they are doing (i.e. the majority of content producers). Bit by bit people get better though - a lot of people have some idea how to use alt now, which is an improvement on 10 years ago. > but I think we would be beating our > heads against a 6' solid oak door if we were to > try to insist that all fallback content be a > perfect substitute for the inaccessible (visual) > content. Indeed. > However, the real question is "Does allow > for fallback content at all?", and the draft spec. > totally fails to clarify this. As far as I can see it does so. Otherwise I would be raising hell - as an implementor of canvas, we need this. In any case, it should never be allowed forward without doing so. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From Philip-and-LeKhanh at Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org Wed Nov 21 07:22:52 2007 From: Philip-and-LeKhanh at Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org (Philip TAYLOR) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:22:52 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Message-ID: <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> The latter >> will, by necessity, almost certainly be a /poor/ >> substitute, > > Only if written by people who don't understand what they are doing (i.e. > the majority of content producers). Bit by bit people get better though - > a lot of people have some idea how to use alt now, which is an improvement > on 10 years ago. Doesn't this pre-suppose that all manipulation of a graphical 2-space can be adequately described in words ? With the best will in the world, I can imagine complex animations that would defeat most of us to describe ... > >> However, the real question is "Does allow >> for fallback content at all?", and the draft spec. >> totally fails to clarify this. > > As far as I can see it does so. Otherwise I would be raising hell - as an > implementor of canvas, we need this. In any case, it should never be > allowed forward without doing so. Would you talk me through your reading of the draft spec. in support of that ? I would like to belive that it is true, but failed to find evidence in the draft spec. as currently written. * Phil. From chaals at opera.com Wed Nov 21 07:34:24 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:34:24 +0100 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> Message-ID: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:22:52 +0100, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >>> The latter >>> will, by necessity, almost certainly be a /poor/ >>> substitute, >> >> Only if written by people who don't understand what they are doing (i.e. >> the majority of content producers). Bit by bit people get better though >> - >> a lot of people have some idea how to use alt now, which is an >> improvement on 10 years ago. > > Doesn't this pre-suppose that all manipulation > of a graphical 2-space can be adequately described > in words ? With the best will in the world, > I can imagine complex animations that would > defeat most of us to describe ... Not at all. As with Flash, I would suggest that ARIA-enhanced SVG is in many cases a far more useful fallback, with plain text being a last resort that should only reached through several other failures. >>> However, the real question is "Does allow >>> for fallback content at all?", and the draft spec. >>> totally fails to clarify this. >> >> As far as I can see it does so. Otherwise I would be raising hell - as >> an implementor of canvas, we need this. In any case, it should never be >> allowed forward without doing so. > > Would you talk me through your reading of the draft > spec. in support of that ? I would like to belive > that it is true, but failed to find evidence in > the draft spec. as currently written. I haven't looked for a while, but last I did you could just put content inside tags if you want. (This actually has issues for current IE, which is a seperate problem :( ) I am not blessed with enough network to look at the spec right now, but I will follow this up. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From annevk at opera.com Wed Nov 21 07:46:39 2007 From: annevk at opera.com (Anne van Kesteren) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:46:39 +0100 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> Message-ID: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:34:24 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> Would you talk me through your reading of the draft >> spec. in support of that ? I would like to belive >> that it is true, but failed to find evidence in >> the draft spec. as currently written. > > I haven't looked for a while, but last I did you could just put content > inside > > > > tags if you want. Relevant quotes from http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#canvas "Authors should not use the canvas element in a document when a more suitable element is available. For example, it is inappropriate to use a canvas element to render a page heading: if the desired presentation of the heading is graphically intense, it should be marked up using appropriate elements (typically h1) and then styled using CSS and supporting technologies such as XBL. When authors use the canvas element, they should also provide content that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially the same function or purpose as the bitmap canvas. This content may be placed as content of the canvas element. The contents of the canvas element, if any, are the element's fallback content. In interactive visual media with scripting enabled, the canvas element is an embedded element with a dynamically created image. In non-interactive, static, visual media, if the canvas element has been previously painted on (e.g. if the page was viewed in an interactive visual medium and is now being printed, or if some script that ran during the page layout process painted on the element), then the canvas element must be treated as embedded content with the current image and size. Otherwise, the element's fallback content must be used instead. In non-visual media, and in visual media with scripting disabled, the canvas element's fallback content must be used instead." -- Anne van Kesteren From P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk Wed Nov 21 08:28:05 2007 From: P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk (Philip Taylor (Webmaster)) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:28:05 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> Message-ID: <47445C95.1040200@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Anne van Kesteren wrote: > When authors use the canvas element, they should also provide content > that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially the same function or > purpose as the bitmap canvas. This content may be placed as content of the > canvas element. The contents of the canvas element, if any, are the > element's fallback content. Thank you, Anne. I was trying to get this information from the syntax description, and it seems somehow odd to me that one should need to go into the prose in order to ascertain whether a container's content is conditionally or unconditionally rendered. Do you believe that this information is actually deducible from the syntax description, or do you believe that the prose is the only source ? Philip TAYLOR From annevk at opera.com Wed Nov 21 08:36:02 2007 From: annevk at opera.com (Anne van Kesteren) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:36:02 +0100 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: <47445C95.1040200@Rhul.Ac.Uk> References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> <47445C95.1040200@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Message-ID: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:28:05 +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > Thank you, Anne. I was trying to get this information from > the syntax description, and it seems somehow odd to me that > one should need to go into the prose in order to ascertain > whether a container's content is conditionally or > unconditionally rendered. Do you believe that this information > is actually deducible from the syntax description, or > do you believe that the prose is the only source ? I believe that the prose is the only source. (There's also no real syntax description. More some rules that are used by the syntax section (8.1).) -- Anne van Kesteren From P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk Wed Nov 21 08:50:08 2007 From: P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk (Philip Taylor (Webmaster)) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:50:08 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> <47445C95.1040200@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Message-ID: <474461C0.9070703@Rhul.Ac.Uk> OK, many thanks for the clarification. -------- Anne van Kesteren wrote: > I believe that the prose is the only source. (There's also no real syntax > description. More some rules that are used by the syntax section (8.1).) > > From P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk Wed Nov 21 09:55:15 2007 From: P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk (Philip Taylor (Webmaster)) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:55:15 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Message-ID: <47447103.6020507@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Charles -- In view of your analysis : >> However, the real question is "Does allow >> for fallback content at all?", and the draft spec. >> totally fails to clarify this. > > As far as I can see it does so. Otherwise I would be raising hell - as an > implementor of canvas, we need this. In any case, it should never be > allowed forward without doing so. what do you make of Richard's remarks : > I object to having in HTML 5. There is no vehicle to > apply accessibility semantics to the markup - unlike SVG. > > Rich > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist ** Phil. From foliot at wats.ca Wed Nov 21 11:31:03 2007 From: foliot at wats.ca (John Foliot) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:31:03 -0800 Subject: [html4all] CANVAS (was Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element") In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <006301c82c75$135e6bd0$0601a8c0@Piglet> Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> However, the real question is "Does allow >> for fallback content at all?", and the draft spec. >> totally fails to clarify this. > > As far as I can see it does so. Otherwise I would be raising hell - > as an implementor of canvas, we need this. In any case, it should > never be allowed forward without doing so. > Well, the Draft Spec states: "When authors use the canvas element, they should also provide content that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially the same function or purpose as the bitmap canvas. This content may be placed as content of the canvas element. The contents of the canvas element, if any, are the element's fallback content." [http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-canvas] ...which to me seems somewhat circular, without really specifying how or what. Breaking down the above, I would surmise that "...content that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially the same function or purpose as the bitmap canvas..." means a textual alternative (but, oh wait, isn't ALT sometimes optional?... But I digress). However the spec does not state this explicitly, nor does the spec indicate that the element can even take on the attribute of ALT; currently the only indicated attributes are height and width. So question one to the draft editors then is, "*How* does the content author specify this other (alternative) content?" As I continue to read through the Draft Spec, I note with interest many code examples, yet none of the current examples show an implementation of content that "...conveys essentially the same function or purpose as the bitmap canvas..." So question two would be, "Can we have an example that specifically and explicitly shows authors *how* to provide this essential content?" Finally, as an addendum, I would humbly suggest that the statement "...they should also provide content that..." be re-written to state "...they MUST also provide content that...", if we are to ensure universal access. However, given the raging debate over ALT, I won't hold my breath. Colleagues, am I missing something here? JF From joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie Wed Nov 21 11:43:39 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:43:39 +0000 Subject: [html4all] Discussion: "Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element" In-Reply-To: References: <1c8dbcaa0711160926l5a6d766dj2e91d408c313473f@mail.gmail.com> <47435BD0.2040906@Rhul.Ac.Uk> <47444D4C.7050904@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> Message-ID: <47448A6B.90200@cfit.ie> Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Not at all. As with Flash, I would suggest that ARIA-enhanced SVG is in > many cases a far more useful fallback, with plain text being a last resort > that should only reached through several other failures. That sounds like a nice graceful degradation - as such. Josh From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Wed Nov 21 13:12:15 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:12:15 -0600 Subject: [html4all] Announcement: Public feedback on HTML Design Principles Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711211312s5fca6d3bw9001b31b983161bd@mail.gmail.com> According to the Nov 16 HTML WG meeting minutes [1] those of you not in the HTML 5 Working Group, but who are interested in providing comments on the HTML 5 Design Principles [2], should send them to public-html-comments at w3.org. Past working group surveys [3] [4] on the document and related history [5] are available. The public comments list also has an archive [6]. Best Regards, Laura [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/11/16-html-wg-minutes#item02 [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/principles/ [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/dprv/results [4] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results [5] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples?action=recall&rev=78#head-f6eb28b3b561a144b2d4a9af50467f4692b8bffc [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/ -- Laura L. Carlson From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Fri Nov 23 02:31:56 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:31:56 +0000 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines Message-ID: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, html authoring guidelines http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-author/ Contributing to this and ensuring that accessible authoring practices are included would be worthwhile. any thoughts? -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie Fri Nov 23 02:53:02 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:53:02 +0000 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4746B10E.6020407@cfit.ie> Hi Steve, > Contributing to this and ensuring that accessible authoring practices > are included would be worthwhile. It would. Just need to figure out *how* to do this. Should we prepare something as a group, maybe start on the wiki and then port the whole thing over? This may be best rather than, I write a bit and you write a bit. Please comment guys and gals Josh From jason at jasonjgw.net Fri Nov 23 02:55:26 2007 From: jason at jasonjgw.net (Jason White) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:55:26 +1100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:31:56AM +0000, Steven Faulkner wrote: > Contributing to this and ensuring that accessible authoring practices > are included would be worthwhile. > > any thoughts? Yet another set of authoring guidelines? My preference would be for a single, unified set of authoring guidelines covering the following: 1. Internationalization. 2. Mobile devices. 3. Accessibility. 4. Other recommended practices. This should be a W3C note, or written outside the W3C context - not another Recommendation-track guidelines document, as we already have enough of those. Consider this a unification of internationalization, WCAG and mobile authoring techniques applied to HTML 5 and to whatever the latest version of CSS is when the HTML spec goes to Recommendation, and possibly covering other technologies as well (although HTML+CSS would be more than enough work). I'm not volunteering to work on this; the object of this post is merely to raise the idea. From chaals at opera.com Fri Nov 23 04:29:15 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:29:15 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> Message-ID: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:55:26 +0100, Jason White wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:31:56AM +0000, Steven Faulkner wrote: > >> Contributing to this and ensuring that accessible authoring practices >> are included would be worthwhile. >> >> any thoughts? > > Yet another set of authoring guidelines? > > My preference would be for a single, unified set of authoring guidelines > covering the following: > > 1. Internationalization. > > 2. Mobile devices. > > 3. Accessibility. > > 4. Other recommended practices. > > This should be a W3C note, or written outside the W3C context I am pretty much 100% in agreement with Jason. I certainly don't think it is very useful to try and make something like this a recommendation - I think it is too complex to justify the effort of getting complete agreement and structuring for conformance testing etc. That said, it is useful. I would suggest, where possible, contributing directly to the work in the HTML WG. Having lots of seperate groups working in parallel is not really optimal in many ways - it makes the discussion more or less impossible to follow, which in turn effectively reduces the transparency of the process. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie Fri Nov 23 04:38:02 2007 From: joshue.oconnor at cfit.ie (Joshue O Connor) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:38:02 +0000 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> Message-ID: <4746C9AA.3000804@cfit.ie> Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:55:26 +0100, Jason White wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:31:56AM +0000, Steven Faulkner wrote: > I am pretty much 100% in agreement with Jason. I certainly don't think it > is very useful to try and make something like this a recommendation - I > think it is too complex to justify the effort of getting complete > agreement and structuring for conformance testing etc. > > That said, it is useful. I would suggest, where possible, contributing > directly to the work in the HTML WG. Having lots of seperate groups > working in parallel is not really optimal in many ways - it makes the > discussion more or less impossible to follow, which in turn effectively > reduces the transparency of the process. Good points from Jason and Chaals. For me, I was just suggesting contributing to the best practice guide for authors within the HTML5 group (when the group can figure out what that is) as many here are also involved but what Jason is suggesting is a W3 free authoring guide. Is that right Jason? However, to be honest I have neither the will nor the spare cycles for a maha rewrite of anything at the mo, am experiencing post book blues. Cheers Josh From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Fri Nov 23 04:55:54 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:55:54 +0000 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> Message-ID: <55687cf80711230455t38c981e1j1952de8200c7b5ed@mail.gmail.com> My initial suggestion was not talking about doing a seperate document, I specifically said "Contributing to this " meaning the proposed html authoring guide. The spec as it stands has some advice about accessible authoring practice (see the stuff on images http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#the-img. This content if it is meant for authors rather than browser implementors (as is my understanding of what the spec is for), should be included in a document that authors are more likely to read. On 23/11/2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:55:26 +0100, Jason White wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:31:56AM +0000, Steven Faulkner wrote: > > > >> Contributing to this and ensuring that accessible authoring practices > >> are included would be worthwhile. > >> > >> any thoughts? > > > > Yet another set of authoring guidelines? > > > > My preference would be for a single, unified set of authoring guidelines > > covering the following: > > > > 1. Internationalization. > > > > 2. Mobile devices. > > > > 3. Accessibility. > > > > 4. Other recommended practices. > > > > This should be a W3C note, or written outside the W3C context > > I am pretty much 100% in agreement with Jason. I certainly don't think it > is very useful to try and make something like this a recommendation - I > think it is too complex to justify the effort of getting complete > agreement and structuring for conformance testing etc. > > That said, it is useful. I would suggest, where possible, contributing > directly to the work in the HTML WG. Having lots of seperate groups > working in parallel is not really optimal in many ways - it makes the > discussion more or less impossible to follow, which in turn effectively > reduces the transparency of the process. > > cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group > je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From annevk at opera.com Fri Nov 23 05:31:26 2007 From: annevk at opera.com (Anne van Kesteren) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:31:26 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711230455t38c981e1j1952de8200c7b5ed@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> <55687cf80711230455t38c981e1j1952de8200c7b5ed@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:55:54 +0100, Steven Faulkner wrote: > The spec as it stands has some advice about accessible authoring > practice (see the stuff on images > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#the-img. > This content if it is meant for authors rather than browser > implementors (as is my understanding of what the spec is for), should > be included in a document that authors are more likely to read. The HTML 5 specification is meant for both authors and implementors. Though given that the specification is very precise (and as a result complex) one or more non-normative documents for authors would probably help them grasp the idea better. -- Anne van Kesteren From faulkner.steve at gmail.com Fri Nov 23 05:41:12 2007 From: faulkner.steve at gmail.com (Steven Faulkner) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:41:12 +0000 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> <55687cf80711230455t38c981e1j1952de8200c7b5ed@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <55687cf80711230541k305cd84aqaa5d64a4402d9afa@mail.gmail.com> Hi Anne, thanks for the clarification. >one or more non-normative documents for authors would probably > help them grasp the idea better. agreed. On 23/11/2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:55:54 +0100, Steven Faulkner > wrote: > > The spec as it stands has some advice about accessible authoring > > practice (see the stuff on images > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#the-img. > > This content if it is meant for authors rather than browser > > implementors (as is my understanding of what the spec is for), should > > be included in a document that authors are more likely to read. > > The HTML 5 specification is meant for both authors and implementors. > Though given that the specification is very precise (and as a result > complex) one or more non-normative documents for authors would probably > help them grasp the idea better. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > > > > _______________________________________________ > List_HTML4all.org mailing list > http://www.html4all.org/wiki > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html From roger at 456bereastreet.com Fri Nov 23 06:27:39 2007 From: roger at 456bereastreet.com (Roger Johansson) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:27:39 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> On 23 nov 2007, at 11.31, Steven Faulkner wrote: > html authoring guidelines > http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-author/ > > Contributing to this and ensuring that accessible authoring practices > are included would be worthwhile. > > any thoughts? Together with Karl Dubost I started working on this in late August/ early September. I definitely think authoring guidelines are needed. I am also of the opinion that the guidelines must be written by real- world web developers with many years' working experience, not spec writing specialists. Further I think they should be as simple and forward-looking as possible, which means they should recommend a unified syntax. /R From hsivonen at iki.fi Fri Nov 23 11:01:43 2007 From: hsivonen at iki.fi (Henri Sivonen) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:01:43 +0200 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <20071123105526.GA15651@jdc.jasonjgw.net> Message-ID: On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:55, Jason White wrote: > Yet another set of authoring guidelines? The document has been retitled not to position it as a "guidelines" document. http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-author/ -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Fri Nov 23 12:05:40 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:05:40 -0600 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> Roger wrote: > Together with Karl Dubost I started working on this in late August/ > early September. Excellent. Great initiative, Roger. Thanks for letting us know. Yes, a simple, and forward-looking Developer's Guide to HTML 5 written by experienced web developers, not spec writing specialists is much needed. > Further I think they should be as simple and forward-looking as > possible, which means they should recommend a unified syntax. How can we help? Best regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From chaals at opera.com Fri Nov 23 12:30:18 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:30:18 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:05:40 +0100, Laura Carlson wrote: > Roger wrote: >> Further I think they should be as simple and forward-looking as >> possible, which means they should recommend a unified syntax. > > How can we help? Provide thoughtful reasoned input to the sometime spec-writing experienced developer who actually stepped forward to take on the job. Or offer enough effort to be a realistic co-editor... cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Fri Nov 23 12:51:47 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:51:47 -0600 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711231251i32698b77sf8a8400ecae82be8@mail.gmail.com> Hi Chaals, > Provide thoughtful reasoned input Yes, fostering constructive feedback for the HTML Working Group is html4all's number one goal [1] Thanks. Best Regards, laura [1] http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/Goals -- Laura L. Carlson From chaals at opera.com Fri Nov 23 16:41:24 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:41:24 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711231251i32698b77sf8a8400ecae82be8@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231251i32698b77sf8a8400ecae82be8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:51:47 +0100, Laura Carlson wrote: > Hi Chaals, > >> Provide thoughtful reasoned input > > Yes, fostering constructive feedback for the HTML Working Group is > html4all's number one goal [1] Right :) Let me elaborate a little... Putting stuff on the HTML list (with enough justification etc to douse the obvious flames) is I think the best way to help this document come out as useful... Although we can discuss it here, I think that the best thing to do is be concrete and practical in the main group. This can also transmit by example the idea of how useful it is to be able to read a significant body of stuff there rather than a flame-war that keeps referring to random other places for its real inspiration and requiring an uncountably infinite reading list. Lachy was thinking about subscribing here for feedback. As his manager in the context of this project, I would be happier to say "don't worry, the HTML 4 all group will make sure everything you need to see and respond to is on the WG list". Of course, that only works if this group are aware of it :) (Also, he is a profesional Web developer by trade and experience - he has been working a little with specifications, but that is a minority of his day job and of his professional experience. At least, that's what his CV and his references said - but I find them pretty credible). cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From roger at 456bereastreet.com Sat Nov 24 00:22:25 2007 From: roger at 456bereastreet.com (Roger Johansson) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:22:25 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 23 nov 2007, at 21.05, Laura Carlson wrote: > Excellent. Great initiative, Roger. Thanks for letting us know. It was Karl's initiative mostly :-) > How can we help? By providing feedback and suggestions as the document is developed. That's likely all I will have time for as well. /R From roger at 456bereastreet.com Sat Nov 24 00:26:17 2007 From: roger at 456bereastreet.com (Roger Johansson) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:26:17 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231251i32698b77sf8a8400ecae82be8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6FA58617-98FF-45FF-AE19-3D00F725087D@456bereastreet.com> On 24 nov 2007, at 01.41, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Lachy was thinking about subscribing here for feedback. As his > manager in > the context of this project, I would be happier to say "don't worry, > the > HTML 4 all group will make sure everything you need to see and > respond to > is on the WG list". Of course, that only works if this group are > aware of > it :) Yes, I think it's better to keep feedback on the public-html list. /R From roger at 456bereastreet.com Sat Nov 24 00:46:58 2007 From: roger at 456bereastreet.com (Roger Johansson) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:46:58 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231251i32698b77sf8a8400ecae82be8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5A1F9F35-1FA9-4625-9185-AAC993D7936A@456bereastreet.com> On 24 nov 2007, at 01.41, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > (Also, he is a profesional Web developer by trade and experience - > he has > been working a little with specifications, but that is a minority of > his > day job and of his professional experience. At least, that's what > his CV > and his references said - but I find them pretty credible). I see now that my comment about the need for experienced web developers can be interpreted in several ways. Sorry about that. What I meant to say is that the more working web professionals that can provide input (and the more impact their input has), the better this document will become, and the less likely it is to be another document that only spec writers and browser vendors can understand. I think Lachlan will do a good job. /R From chaals at opera.com Sat Nov 24 04:07:17 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:07:17 +0100 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <5A1F9F35-1FA9-4625-9185-AAC993D7936A@456bereastreet.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231251i32698b77sf8a8400ecae82be8@mail.gmail.com> <5A1F9F35-1FA9-4625-9185-AAC993D7936A@456bereastreet.com> Message-ID: On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:46:58 +0100, Roger Johansson wrote: > On 24 nov 2007, at 01.41, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >> (Also, he is a profesional Web developer by trade and experience - >> he has >> been working a little with specifications, but that is a minority of >> his >> day job and of his professional experience. At least, that's what >> his CV >> and his references said - but I find them pretty credible). > > I see now that my comment about the need for experienced web > developers can be interpreted in several ways. Sorry about that. What > I meant to say is that the more working web professionals that can > provide input (and the more impact their input has), the better this > document will become, and the less likely it is to be another document > that only spec writers and browser vendors can understand. Ah, then we agree entirely :) > I think Lachlan will do a good job. I hope so :) cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com Sat Nov 24 05:33:06 2007 From: laura.lee.carlson at gmail.com (Laura Carlson) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:33:06 -0600 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: <5A1F9F35-1FA9-4625-9185-AAC993D7936A@456bereastreet.com> References: <55687cf80711230231l4e39c357i76a6b00071e78631@mail.gmail.com> <76A568C0-3358-4D10-83EB-6E68902F0873@456bereastreet.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231205s61334f3j2e88c41f15ee2151@mail.gmail.com> <1c8dbcaa0711231251i32698b77sf8a8400ecae82be8@mail.gmail.com> <5A1F9F35-1FA9-4625-9185-AAC993D7936A@456bereastreet.com> Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0711240533y21210051p7f18ca37bfc21e46@mail.gmail.com> Hi, > I see now that my comment about the need for experienced web > developers can be interpreted in several ways. Thanks for the clarification, Roger. And welcome to html4all, Lachlan! It is a pleasure to have you with us. We haven't opened to the public yet, as we are completing our founding documents and finishing up a few loose ends. But thank you for joining us early :-) Your perspective and expertise is most valuable. And thank you for taking on this worthy task. Some html4all subscribers are not HTML Working group members but may wish to develop ideas, discuss and provide thoughtful reasoned input into this worthy document (as well as others) along with working group members, in the html4all venue. html4all is striving to provide an open, honest, collaborative, and respectful environment. For information visit: http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/List_Guidelines http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/List_Moderation_Policy http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/On_Topic_/_Off_Topic http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/Mission_Statement http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/Vision_Statement http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/Goals http://html4all.org/wiki/index.php/Inaugural_Members Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson From vlad.alexander at xstandard.com Sat Nov 24 05:52:28 2007 From: vlad.alexander at xstandard.com (Vlad Alexander (XStandard)) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:52:28 -0500 Subject: [html4all] html authoring guidelines Message-ID: Charles, for various reasons, not everyone can join the HTML WG list. Roger, it's good to see XHTML serialization being treated as a peer to HTML serialization in this document, unlike the way it is treated in the main spec. Regards, -Vlad http://xhtml.com From chaals at opera.com Sat Nov 24 08:14:25 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:14:25 +0100 Subject: [html4all] HTMLWG was Re: html authoring guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Vlad, On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:52:28 +0100, Vlad Alexander wrote: > Charles, for various reasons, not everyone can join the HTML WG list. I'm intrigued to know of good reasons people cannot join the HTML-WG. I am aware that joining implies a commitment to be honest about patents you know of, and I hope that is not a reaon anyone is holding back. I specifically asked about Apple, who seem to hold most of their video discussion on WHAT-WG (where there is no patent policy of any kind), but was reassured that they believe the policy applies to whatever they add to HTML, no matter where they hold the discussion. I realise there are good reasons why people might not be able to effectively participate (or even deal with the amount of traffic). Did you mean something more than this? cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha From chaals at opera.com Sat Nov 24 08:29:25 2007 From: chaals at opera.com (Charles McCathieNevile) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:29:25 +0100 Subject: [html4all] CANVAS (was Discussion: "Accept requirement... In-Reply-To: <006301c82c75$135e6bd0$0601a8c0@Piglet> References: <006301c82c75$135e6bd0$0601a8c0@Piglet> Message-ID: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:31:03 +0100, John Foliot wrote: > Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >>> However, the real question is "Does allow >>> for fallback content at all?", and the draft spec. >>> totally fails to clarify this. >> >> As far as I can see it does so. Otherwise I would be raising hell - >> as an implementor of canvas, we need this. In any case, it should >> never be allowed forward without doing so. >> > > Well, the Draft Spec states: > > "When authors use the canvas element, they should also provide content > that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially the same function > or purpose as the bitmap canvas. This content may be placed as content > of the canvas element. The contents of the canvas element, if any, are > the element's fallback content." > [http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-canvas] (Which means it works like the object element...) > ...I would surmise that "...content that... conveys essentially the > same function or purpose..." means a textual alternative... Not at all. > So question one to the draft editors then is, "*How* does the content > author specify this other (alternative) content?" Normally, put it inside the canvas (in minimal HTML-legal but non XHTML syntax that I realy don't recommend to anyone ever): canvas example